Thinking like a millennial – the future of the Australian university

This image comes from La Trobe University’s Bold Thinking site.
With the recent announcement that the expansion of undergraduate education in Australia appears to be over[1], La Trobe University’s Vice-Chancellor John Dewar got the timing right to bring together his fellow leaders in higher education for a conversation on the Future of the University.
Kicking off the discussion as part of La Trobe’s Bold Thinking Series, Margaret Gardner AO, Vice-Chancellor of Monash University, made an early call for calm saying “there is no existential crisis in the university system”. However all the VCs spoke of their concerns for the sector in assessing how institutions will need to continue to adapt in a rapidly changing social and technical environment.
Outgoing Vice-Chancellor of The University of Melbourne, Glyn Davis states that as universities in Australia are now highly dependent on both domestic and international students for their income, this may become more of a challenge in the future. A growing conservative trend by governments to rein in the sector, such as in the UK, was seen as another factor for concern among university leaders. As Dewar points out, attempts to dampen the sector appear paradoxical, as universities in Australia now support tertiary education for around 40% of all school leavers and contribute to substantial export income through their efforts in internationalisation. The VCs suggest some of the apparent hostility toward universities may be due to institutions becoming too big and more managerial in style, or even because of their growing international reach.
However, all the panellists note there is plenty of work for the sector to do. Keeping curriculum relevant was seen as a major challenge, given the first millennial generation will arrive at universities in 2018. While Dewar notes a key role of the university remains “to form rounded individuals”, he suggests teaching must continue to offer enough flexibility and knowledge development for graduates “to form the new professions and problem solvers of the future” – whatever their roles may be. Davis suggests that to achieve this, rather than simply increasing the offering of comprehensive institutions, the sector may need to diversify into smaller specialist institutions which are better equipped to develop relevant industry relationships and new job pathways.
While there are many organic changes happening in universities through new approaches to course development, Dewar highlights how universities are working more at the edges of their core offering to engage with industry. With examples such as Swinburne University’s partnership with Seek in online education, Deakin University’s partnership with Cisco for degree credentials via Deakin Digital and Flinders University’s partnership with the innovation community in Tonsley Park in South Australia, Dewar shows how universities are now acting more strategically to respond to change through partnerships.
In a discussion on the relationship between the university and TAFE sectors, Dewar proposes that La Trobe’s regional co-development of programs with the TAFE sector is a model to bridge a number of regulatory barriers in the post-school system in Australia. Gardner too considers that conversations on the relationship need to be more around arriving at robust post-school models and options for all rather than focusing on addressing political divisions of funding and tertiary education regulation.
Moderator Virginia Trioli, herself a La Trobe alumna, asked the VCs, (who all spent time early in their careers at Griffith University) – to put themselves in the shoes of a millennial student and consider what they might study if they were to arrive at university for the first time in 2018. Although sadly none suggested opting for a switch to science or information technology, Gardner would like to stretch more into Arts, while Dewar would stay close to social science as he is “not too good at maths” and Davis would opt to start with the course in politics he had to write because it wasn’t there when he started university.
In closing, and with a note on looking back and forward, Gardner emphasises that for more than a thousand years the university has been an “author of social disruption” and needs to continue to focus on its social role as a source of ideas, questions and solutions rather than giving in to the “noise” of the moment.
[1] Campus Morning Mail 16 November 2017 Student starts slow: full 2016 university data.
Post by Megan Power
Monash-Warwick PhD Candidate
Centre of Social and Organisational Informatics
Faculty of Information Technology
@researchMegan



